by Rolando Mathias
How I Designed a Blockchain App that Reached 200K Users in 6 months
Primablock is a smart contract SaaS product that handles the accounting and remittance work for the ICO pooling and investing process. My two co-founders and I started it as a side project for our small community, in response to inefficiencies and friction in our workflows.
In mid 2017, we launched to ~80 people. A perfect storm of execution and luck let us scale quickly. Users poured in from around the world with business and feedback. We suddenly had a full-fledged startup. It was the hardest and most intense thing I’ve done. But also the most formative and rewarding. PrimaBlock has processed hundreds of millions of dollars worth of Ethereum and has served a few hundred thousand people.
In this article, I’d like to share with you my design process.
User research: Discovering the needs of the ICO investment community
We analyzed user behavior to understand the workflows and pain points of our target. We had the fortune of being part of the community we were building for, so empathy was a precursor.
“It’s precisely this sort of observation-fueled insight that makes innovation possible.” - Tom Kelley, The Art of Innovation.
From a high level, an ICO deal flow looks like this:
We segmented our user base into two groups: Admins and Contributors.
Our questions focused on different parts of the work flow, but we were precise about the wording to make our interviewees recount specifics, as opposed to generalizing about an approach.
- The last time you created a pool, what frustrated you about it?
- The last pool you administered, how did you keep track of each contribution?
- Have you ever had to refund a pool? In the most recent time, what was the process? What frustrated you about that process?
- How did you distribute tokens to your contributors? How did you calculate shares?
- How has your workflow evolved from deal to deal?
Similarly, the questions to our contributors also focused on the different parts of the workflow.
- The last time you contributed to a pool, what concerned you?
- The last time you received tokens, what concerned you?
- Has any part of your workflow evolved from deal to deal?
- Please walk us through contributing to and organizing X deal.
The critical incidents that bridged all of the Admins were solving the complexity around the accounting work, as well as the dozens — or hundreds — of tedious wallet transactions. The common thread among the Contributors was simply, or not so simply, trust. Because of the blockchain complexity, they didn’t trust themselves to make transactions properly, or trust the Admins’ to do error-free accounting. The blockchain has no central authority and most investors don’t know the true identities of who they’re dealing with. Mistakes can be irreversible.
The solution: A winning combination of design and blockchain tech
We created a platform on which anyone can interact with — and take advantage of — Ethereum smart contracts. Users are still required to send transactions externally, but we simplify and organize the process so anyone can participate in a reliable, organized way. The unbearably long processing times that come with blockchain transactions are out of our hands, but the design patterns resemble conventional products.
Jakobs Law states that users spend most of their time on other sites and expect yours to behave similarly. So we made a big effort to abstract away from the blockchain and lower the learning curve, as I’ll show throughout.
Blockchain constraints changed the way we onboard
PrimaBlock is a two-sided platform that serves Admins and Contributors, both of which have the same end goal. The Admins, however, do most of the heavy lifting by creating the pools and setting the terms by which Contributors can invest. When I mapped the flow with all of the customizations, I was concerned about the abandonment rate. The alternative was to only require the absolute minimum (wallet address) and allow Admins to customize their pools after deployment.
We front-loaded the customizations for two reasons.
- First, I spoke with Admins about their workflow, and they always had most of the criterion planned out before creating a pool.
- Second, every customization requires a transaction on the blockchain, which costs gas. So, if we postponed customizations until after bringing users to their dashboards, they would likely spend more on gas and bear the tedium of more transactions.
Ultimately, PrimaBlock is such a high-value service that Admins have not been deterred by the onboarding length.
There are three versions of Admins onboarding.
Version one includes tool-tip definitions that require hover states to reveal important information. I noticed that all first time Admins (and even some returning) were surfacing this information, so I wanted to remove the need for extra interactions. We tried side panels, but testing revealed that:
- Users didn’t assume that the panels had relevant info, and
- It was annoying to look back and forth.
Educating noobs: our biggest challenge
ICO investing relies on blockchain infrastructure, which poses a steep learning curve because of its unfamiliar processes. Our first version fit our early adopters well for the types of deals we saw while building the product.
But, we ran into many issues as we scaled to new users and deal types that presented new use cases. To that end, the three of us added full-time customer support (via our Telegram channel) to our duties. The support work proved to be incredibly helpful to regain the beginner’s perspective and stay in tune with the rapidly evolving industry.
Side panel: in-app documentation
There are two levels of in-app support:
- Tool tips use hover states to expose secondary information, mainly definitions.
- Critical information used to address different use cases that come with the nuances of different deals is on the side panel.
We used our experience in customer support to create content and organize the side panel and FAQ.
Abstracting away from the blockchain (comes with a cost)
PrimaBlock accepts the complexity of smart contract calculations and interactions from its users. The simplification has many value adds, but it requires the platform to give feedback to users so that they know what’s happening.
Our biggest shortcoming was not providing this feedback. The anxiety on users compounds because blockchain transactions are irreversible and can have long, inconsistent processing times. Blockchain products typically violate the Doherty Threshold, which states that productivity and satisfaction increase in direct proportion to a decrease in response time.
Since all of our users are accustomed to the speed of centralized networks, they have impatience with the decentralized sort.
Version 1 had typical loading spinners but they spun up to several minutes depending on user and network variables, leaving users in the dark. Here are two categories of information to give our users peace of mind: banners and contextual messages.
Transactions are the core of everything
“The only problem I ran into was not setting my Gwei in Metamask high enough, so my order got held up and I missed the boat on one ICO.” - PrimaBlock user.
Every action in a smart contract requires a user to make a transaction on the blockchain. PB does all of the calculations and provides the data that will get users the results they want, but users must still perform each transaction with their wallets on an external provider.
Even though users have full control over their wallets and, therefore, transactions, it was still important to expose the transaction data. We did this from the first version. Users appreciated the transparency because it showed how we were replacing and improving their previous processes.
Once we built trust and comfort, we added a shortcut to remove the number of interactions required to complete a transaction. In the below image, users can pre-fill all of the transaction data with one click (“Send with MyCrypto” CTA).
Even our early users needed tips on the finer points of making a fast, cost efficient transaction. Sometimes, not knowing this information means losing out on a deal because your transaction didn’t process fast enough. Other times, it means losing the money you invested in gas because you didn’t invest enough to make the transaction succeed.
Giving Admins control: the whitelist journey
When we were building v1, many Admins wanted to make their pools exclusive, to reward people in their community and/or not risk exceeding their allocations.
If an Admin wanted to enforce a whitelist manually, they would first need to make an effort to not let their contribution address become exposed to uninvited parties. These efforts were usually in vain, so they’d then cross reference all incoming transactions with an address spreadsheet. We solved this by creating a whitelist feature.
However, version one had shortcomings, because we didn’t build for the nuances that many Admins needed.
- First, we didn’t anticipate that whitelists would change, along with allocation amounts, during one deal cycle.
- Second, as the industry evolved, KYC requirements became crucial as deals wanted to avoid the wrath of the SEC. Unwelcome guests have caused entire deals to collapse.
- Third, because of the smart contract’s flexibility, there were different interpretations of the nuances of how the white list works, as shown by the quote below.
“One person I talked to was surprised that changing the max contribution threshold would evict people who previously contributed even though their contribution was higher than the new threshold.” - PB co-founder, Tamir.
In short, Admins wanted granular control over their lists and to be able to edit based on deal progression.
Visualizing pool history without hacks
“Hey wondering is there a way to find out what pools I have contributed to through Primablock? I’m worried about losing track of them all and don’t know how to find everything.” - PrimaBlock user.
We had a pool history feature on our roadmap from our early days, but we didn’t prioritize it because our early users were savvy with external resources (like Etherscan) to track their transactions.
One pain that not having pool history caused was that, if a user was searching for a pool they contributed to or administered, they would have to find the contract address and then search for it in the app. As we scaled and kept aiming to improve the UX, we wanted to present as much valuable info to our users from within our service. The need for this became more crucial as our users had to satisfy tax reporting obligations.
We created this after having several months of live product experience under our belt so we nailed it ? on the first try.
Winning growth strategies ?
After the product was up and running, we started to think about growth strategies that would create network effects.
My co-founders and I brainstormed about possibilities within the smart contract constraints and we came up with chaining. Fortunately, my co-founders are wizards on the backend and are able to seemingly solve anything. Chaining was no exception. This allows users to create child pools that feed into parent pools.
Instead of building out the feature, we started with a concierge MVP to provide the service manually. It was well-received, however we ran into some push back from Admins because the chained pools undermined the whitelists. My team fixed that on the backend in no time and we were up and running ??.
Chaining was a big success because it opened up pool creation to the vast majority of users who didn’t have access to ICOs to make their own deals. Chaining incentivizes users to recruit people from their network who would potentially make money and ultimately pay fees. It was an all-around win.
I exited my full-time role at PrimaBlock in April of this year. It was a remarkable experience that I never expected to have when I made my foray into the blockchain as a casual investor. I am happy that I had the curiosity and passion to solve a problem that needed solving. I am even happier that I had brilliant co-founders/developers, Mickael Fourgeaud and Tamir Sen, whose work ethic and talent on the back end is unparalleled. They deserve most of the credit for the success of the product.
“[PrimaBlock] brand loyalty is unlike anything I’ve seen in the space.” - Hen Tekle, Angel investor/Advisor
Feedback plays a crucial role in improving. PrimaBlock has users from around the world. If you’ve used it, then I’d love to hear your experience in the comments below. If you have any feedback about my design decisions or the blockchain in general, let me know here as well.
I encourage everyone in the tech industry to put their whole selves into solving problems. You have the opportunity to create so much value around the world with some pixels and code (not to mention long days and late nights). I’m grateful to have worked with - and continue to work - with talented people. I’m more motivated than ever to see what else I can solve.
Note 1: due to severe front-end development constraints, there are big discrepancies between my mockups and the live product. PrimaBlock just hired a front-end wiz so big UI changes forthcoming ?.
Note 2: my claim in the title about number of users is a best estimate of how many users have ever used the app. The estimate is based on wallet addresses that have interacted with PB, and analytics. PB only recently launched accounts to comply with the evolving regulatory landscape.
If you have any comments about PrimaBlock, please post here. Anything else, check out my portfolio.✌️